The best mathematics produced in any given century neither completely ignores the dominant paradigm(s) of that century, nor allows itself to be trapped by them. It works at the edges of established mathematics, moving freely between civilization and unfettered jungle. We should create more mathematics that is moderately subversive, that makes use of existing ideas when they're appropriate but ventures deep into the jungle when they're not.
A list of my favorite questions and answers (more coming soon):
- The difference between maximum and maximal. (JDH)
- What is this axiom saying? (Zhen Lin)
- Why we use the word 'compact' for compact spaces? (dtldarek)
- Is "imposing" one function onto another ever used in mathematics? (Steven Fontaine)
- Is every Noetherian module finitely-generated? (Arturo Magidin)
Top Network Posts
- 132Pedagogy: How to cure students of the "law of universal linearity"?
- 68Is π equal to 180$^\circ$?
- 54Does associativity imply commutativity?
- 48Mathematicians ahead of their time?
- 41Struggling with "technique-based" mathematics, can people relate to this? And what, if anything, can be done about it?
- 38What recent programmes to alter highly-entrenched mathematical terminology have succeeded, and under what conditions do they tend to succeed or fail?
- 36Is there a way to prove that $2+2$ really equals $4$?
- View more network posts →